Teams

VC TEAL

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-23vs LTFC GREENWon 20
W#2 SinglesKatie Sznewajs vs Lisa Lash6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTi Mougne / Danielle Dahl vs Jill Nelson / Virginia Gamble6-4, 6-1
2024-05-16vs HW TEALSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Reinemund / Chrissy Coolidge vs Jill Smith / Meredith van Wyk0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTi Mougne / Danielle Dahl vs Kim Williams / Christy Serenyi6-0, 6-4
2024-05-13vs HV GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesChrissy Coolidge / Ti Mougne vs Rhonda Williamson / Lisa DeBastos6-4
2024-05-09vs GCC REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatie Sznewajs vs Marcy White6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBailey Taber / Kate Reinemund vs Julie Buckley / Tracy McInnes6-2, 6-2
2024-05-02vs GAC GOLDWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Sznewajs / Kate Reinemund vs Elizabeth Lord / Anna Stansbury6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTi Mougne / Danielle Dahl vs Debra Benge / Tracy Powers7-5, 6-2
2024-04-25vs SS-H BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesChrissy Coolidge / Kate Reinemund vs Lynn Price / Lisa Zook2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDanielle Dahl / Ti Mougne vs Lisa Robertson / Sheila Laurienti6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Danielle Dahl
published 3.5
3.23
Kate Reinemund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Ti Mougne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Katie Portenga
published
3.05
Katie Sznewajs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Chrissy Coolidge
published 3
Katie Schneck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ti Mougne + Danielle Dahl404 matchesnot enough data
Katie Sznewajs + Kate Reinemund134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Dahl
33W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Kate Reinemund
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Ti Mougne
57W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Katie Portenga
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Katie Sznewajs
36W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Chrissy Coolidge
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Schneck
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.