Teams

Ca.Aden18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-09vs Am.Cantando18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathryn Hamrick / Adria McGlamery vs Janie Morgan / Karen Bornhofen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Williams Aden / Katie White vs Anne Enberg / Kelly Hurter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-25vs Sp.Menzel18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hamrick / Adria McGlamery vs Heath Hilliker / Angier Miller6-1, 6-0
2025-08-28vs Ka.Steadman18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Howard / Caroline Williams Aden vs Tricia Manger / Shannon Clarkson6-3, 6-3
2025-08-22vs Co.Hicks18C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdria McGlamery / Caroline Williams Aden vs Sydney Beasley / Mary Margaret Ross6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Adria McGlamery
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Lindsey Taylor
published
2.77
Ashley Randall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Kathryn Hamrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Meagan Heath
published
2.60
Ashley Whited
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Haley Davies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Heidi Suke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.49
Caroline Williams Aden
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.39
Paige Coltrera
published
2.31
Brooke Russ
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adria McGlamery + Lindsey Taylor4647% games+4.4% vs expected
Ashley Whited + Kathryn Hamrick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adria McGlamery
54W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Lindsey Taylor
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Ashley Randall
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Kathryn Hamrick
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Meagan Heath
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Ashley Whited
8W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Haley Davies
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.57
2.5
Heidi Suke
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Caroline Williams Aden
22W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Paige Coltrera
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Brooke Russ
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.