Teams

4 Southampton Roper 3.5

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-06vs 12 SCC Serve-vivors - WeisigerWon 21
W#1 SinglesDeena Kretzer vs Catherine Baldridge6-4
W#2 SinglesAlice McCollum vs Becky McNeer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesApril Titler vs Betsy Gibson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-25vs 14 Westwood HarperLost 12
L#1 SinglesDeena Kretzer vs Hayley Herrin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPamela Hutzler vs Liza Joyner2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLily VanElderen vs Sarah Paladino-strater7-6, 6-3
2025-10-23vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShelly Galles vs Amanda Phillips4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlice McCollum vs Rochelle Preston6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDeena Kretzer vs Rebecca Schwartz3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Hutzler vs Amber Manry4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesApril Titler vs Mary-Margaret Whitten3-6, 1-6
2025-10-11vs 6 MRTC Northnuts - LeyLost 12
W#1 SinglesLily VanElderen vs Louise McCool1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristen Roper vs Suzanne Ley1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesApril Titler vs Jennifer Carlin4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-04vs 16 MAC AbelLost 03
L#1 SinglesAlice McCollum vs Eleanor Gardner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLily VanElderen vs Eunice Williams6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Hutzler vs Jamie Stokes1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Deena Kretzer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Alice McCollum
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lily VanElderen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.03
Pamela Hutzler
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.93
April Titler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
2.88
Kristen Roper
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Shelly Galles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Roper + Alice McCollum033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deena Kretzer
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alice McCollum
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Lily VanElderen
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Pamela Hutzler
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
April Titler
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Andrea Bleck-Smith
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Kristen Roper
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Shelly Galles
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.