Teams

Legacy Love All

Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women DelChes Wed Winter

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-11vs Causing a RacquetLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Jackett / Jolie Gordon vs Rachel Pavis / Jennifer Enck1-6, 4-6
2025-02-12vs Girls Love AllSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichelle Narin / Katherina Rosqueta vs Michelle O'Brien / Christine Brunelli6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNatalie Schell-Busey vs Ellie Dillon7-5, 2-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Lember / Ginny Salzer vs Alyson Deveney / Allison Fenlin4-6, 2-4
L#3 DoublesErica Hart / Zhanna Riloff vs Katie Timby / Carolyn Kaufmann4-6, 6-5, 1-0
2025-02-04vs Causing a RacquetWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Donoghue / Jennifer Jackett vs Jessica Mash / Jennifer Russell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-08vs Girls Love AllLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Schell-Busey / Tammi van Hollander vs Elizabeth Galvin / Amy Needle6-3, 1-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSamantha Harris / Barbara Winokur vs Christine Brunelli / Alyson Deveney6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Lember / Kelly McClure vs Allison Cancro / Janine Cox7-5, 5-1
2024-12-10vs UMLY FusionLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jackett / Mary Donoghue vs Jill Cohen / Karen Krane3-6, 1-6
2024-11-13vs Girls Love AllSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEelin Lim / Tammi van Hollander vs Ellie Dillon / Michelle O'Brien7-6, 4-1
L#1 SinglesGinny Salzer vs Meredith Dorney3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Klebanoff / Erica Hart vs Rebecca Catterson / Christine Brunelli2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly McClure / Catherine Barrett vs Allison Cancro / Janine Cox6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women DelChes Wed Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Eelin Lim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Jen Weikert
published
2.91
Michelle Narin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Natalie Schell-Busey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Amanda Lember
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Samantha Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Anna Doctors
published 3
2.77
Jennifer Jackett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Erica Hart
published 3
Erika Kaplan
published 3
2.73
Tammi van Hollander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Catherine Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Emily Klebanoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Kelly McClure
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Katherina Rosqueta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Zhanna Riloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Barbara Winokur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Ginny Salzer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Nancy Winkler
published
Patti Reiver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Schell-Busey + Eelin Lim6262% games+18.3% vs expected
Zhanna Riloff + Erica Hart5355% games+0.1% vs expected
Barbara Winokur + Samantha Harris4454% games−5.8% vs expected
Tammi van Hollander + Michelle Narin3446% games−6.1% vs expected
Katherina Rosqueta + Michelle Narin3741% games−12.8% vs expected
Emily Klebanoff + Michelle Narin5153% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Winkler + Amanda Lember2441% gamesnot enough data
Katherina Rosqueta + Jen Weikert1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eelin Lim
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
Jen Weikert
33W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Michelle Narin
52W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Natalie Schell-Busey
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Amanda Lember
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Samantha Harris
28W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Anna Doctors
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Jennifer Jackett
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Vresilovic
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Erica Hart
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Erika Kaplan
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammi van Hollander
39W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Catherine Barrett
32W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Emily Klebanoff
16W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kelly McClure
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Katherina Rosqueta
26W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Zhanna Riloff
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Barbara Winokur
34W–61L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.52
3
Ginny Salzer
19W–42L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37
Nancy Winkler
7W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Reiver
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.