Teams

Pierpont Racquettes

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-16vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Mariana Schindler vs Wendy Nickerson / Margery Teller7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Stompe / Diana Trinh-Salzer vs Jennifer House / Vanessa Rodriguez4-6, 1-6
2024-04-09vs Valle Lindo double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Lauren Stompe vs Louise Hewitt / Esther Lopez4-6, 4-6
2024-03-26vs Sherwood StarletsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Stompe / Diana Trinh-Salzer vs Gail Spayde / Eileen Kakoyiannis3-6, 3-6
2024-03-21vs North Ranch Wonder WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Lauren Stompe vs Angela Reynolds / Brooke Roth0-6, 2-6
2024-02-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Lauren Stompe vs Catherine Haywood / Young Kang6-2, 6-2
2024-02-26vs Spanish Hills 40 LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Duddy / Diana Trinh-Salzer vs Wissal Buscemi / Jill Heybl4-5
2024-02-15vs Winter WACETTES 2024Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Joeli Gutfleisch vs Marilyn Hewitson / Lynn Abroms2-6, 4-6
2024-01-11vs Las Posas Net ResultsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Stompe / Diana Trinh-Salzer vs Amy Galan / Lisa Weckbacher2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-01-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Trinh-Salzer / Lauren Stompe vs Jill Cavalier / Gail Spayde6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Lucia Shanahan
published
3.04
Nicolette Villa
published
3.03
Diana Trinh-Salzer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.01
Erin Kraus
published 3
2.71
Susan Bender
published
2.70
Julie McCaslin
published
2.62
2.59
Saudamini Sindhar
published
Patty Mallery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Kraus + Julie McCaslin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucia Shanahan
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Nicolette Villa
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Diana Trinh-Salzer
29W–78L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Erin Kraus
7W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Susan Bender
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
Julie McCaslin
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Linda Manguiat-Herzog
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Saudamini Sindhar
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Patty Mallery
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.