Teams

Labbee

2019 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
America Hopson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Labbe / Sarah Robertson vs Anh Nguyen / Carissa Raleigh6-1, 6-4
2019-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Labbe / Sarah Robertson vs Andrea Lamprecht / Tove Maloco6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmerica Hopson / Sarah Robertson vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits6-2, 6-2
2019-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Labbe / America Hopson vs Tina Nelson / Christy Wilson7-5, 6-4
2019-06-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Labbe / Sarah Robertson vs Hilary Johnson / Erin Casey6-4, 7-5
2019-06-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmerica Hopson / Lisa Labbe vs Amy Cooney / Brooke Daniel6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmerica Hopson / Lisa Labbe vs Kelly Norling / Jennifer Raze6-1, 6-1
2019-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmerica Hopson / Lisa Labbe vs Dorothy Cofield / Laura Walker6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
America Hopson
22W–43L career
7%93%0%
3.18
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.