← Search

Sarah Robertson

Happy Valley, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 72W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Robertson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-05-22 · GLVR-Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louis Hunt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-09 · GLVR-Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louis Hunt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · PTC-Sefchick/Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greta Miracle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · PTC-Sefchick/Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-05 · PTC-Sefchick/Traylen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teufelin Traylen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · GLVR-Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Archer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-20 · GLVR-Robertson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Grissom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Greenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Greenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · CAC-Ramsey/Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Greenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-30 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Cervantez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-01 · GLVR-Greenblatt/Robertson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Greenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2012–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 55.2% of games
3.5
29.3%
12W–29L · 42.7% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.6% of games
7.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 55.5% of games
7.0mixed
29.8%
14W–33L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
53 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe