← Search

Kara Kraft

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 69W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kara Kraft to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Wreckreational Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Linda Dallof / Annie Nguyen
2026-07-21 · Wreckreational Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Hata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · CRRC-Johnson/Ash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · CRRC-Johnson/Ash · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Ryan Owens championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · Wreckreational Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-03 · Wreckreational Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · Wreckreational Tennis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Hata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · CRRC-Johnson/Ash · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · LOTC-Kraft · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · LOTC-Kraft · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McCarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · LOTC-Kraft · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 77.7% of games
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 82.5% of games
3.5
72.5%
37W–14L · 60.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
44 matches
#1 Singles
20%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer