← Search

Kristen LaBarca

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 67W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristen LaBarca to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Genevieve Rollier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Nolan/LaBarca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Nolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genevieve Rollier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · IRV-LaBarca/Nolan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genevieve Rollier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.1% of games
3.5
54.4%
37W–31L · 51.1% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 74.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
42 matches
#1 Singles
23%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe