← Search

Miki Han

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 64W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Miki Han to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Becker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Becker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Angie Urrutia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Angie Urrutia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Yaris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · NOR-Becker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Angie Urrutia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.2% of games
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 58.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 32.3% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 67% of games
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert