Search

Emily Vander Ploeg

Tualatin, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
107 matches · 78W–29L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
82%
stay 3.5
18%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.36. Lower than today’s 3.43 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tualatin · 3.5
5 of 17
OR · 3.5
135 of 735

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 95th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.1% of games
3.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 61.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Shull · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Weaver
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · THPRD-Shull · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suresh Chand
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · LOTC-Shull · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Vanderploeg
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Miki Hanchamps
2026-06-19 · #2 Singles
0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Weaver
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · LOTC-Shull · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Vanderploeg
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Layla Gonzalez
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Leong/Vicino · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.039below expectation — took 65% of games against 74% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-24 · WHRC-Leong/Vicino · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.071below expectation — took 54% of games against 78% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · WHRC-Leong · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.020better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Cricket Forsey / Jennifer Wiencek
2026-05-09 · WHRC-Leong/Vicino · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loo Yah Leong
0.011about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · WHRC-Leong/Vicino · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.046better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · WHRC-Leong/Vicino · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.015below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.