← Search

Gabriel Weaver

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 133W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gabriel Weaver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Vander Ploeg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Xiaolu Huang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-18 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Cao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Vander Ploeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-03 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shannon Roarke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · NOR-THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Vander Ploeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suresh Chand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andalib Khan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andalib Khan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sev Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-22 · THPRD-Flores/Yuan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suresh Chand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.9%
50W–27L · 54.4% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 60.9% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
40W–12L · 59.7% of games
8.0mixed
60.6%
20W–13L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe