← Search

Shannon Roarke

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 140W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shannon Roarke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Hong Huynh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Hong Huynh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-08-05 · Chasing Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · Chasing Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Akemi Okusada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kirt Eftekhar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Chasing Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · Chasing Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Benkstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-03 · MPRC-Mendenhall/Palmer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gabriel Weaver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Sheila Anderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Hong Huynh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · NOR-MPRC-Huynh · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NOR-MPRC-Huynh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2011–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 64.4% of games
4.0
81%
47W–11L · 61.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
16W–0L · 69.1% of games
8.0mixed
84.8%
28W–5L · 58.7% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer