← Search

Sara Simonson

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 198W–85L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Sara Simonson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Tilney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Esther Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Esther Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Esther Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · BETC-Jet Point-Pereira · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Haffner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · SWW-Simonson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · SWW-TLTC-Paul · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Piston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Miller Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · SWW-Simonson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Tilney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · SWW-Simonson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · BETC-Jet Point-Pereira · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Haffner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.4% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 63.6% of games
4.0
82.1%
87W–19L · 63.1% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 40.5% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
140 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
57 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova