Teams

SWW-TLTC-Paul

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-01vs SWW-STAC-DavisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Paul / Angela Boice vs Colleen Sharkey / Florian Purganan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Piston / Kim Hood vs Kevin Andry / Angela Byrum6-4, 6-4
2026-07-26vs NWW-TCSP-LaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Deitz / Amy Hsu vs Carmen Zlateff / Jeffrey Rice6-0, 6-2
2026-07-19vs SWW-STAC-DavisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrista Philbrick / Richard Deitz vs Rachel Lovingfoss / Adam Lucero6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Piston / Kim Hood vs Tonya Schmid / Craig Schmid6-7, 4-5
2026-07-17vs SWW-STAC-DavisWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Paul / Angela Boice vs Darrel Leimback / Chanel Nielsen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Piston / Sara Simonson vs Kevin Andry / Angela Byrum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-28vs NWW-AYTC-CzeislerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Debiec / Richard Deitz vs Jeffrey Richards / Shannon Fosseen7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-20vs SWW-STAC-DavisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Piston / Alana Wade vs Craig Schmid / Tonya Schmid6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndreas Ohrbeck / Krista Philbrick vs Florian Purganan / Tami Davis6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Richard Deitz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Ryan Paul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.30
Andrew Piston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.27
Andreas Ohrbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Alana Wade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Sara Simonson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Kim Hood
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.80
Krista Philbrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Angela Boice
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Paul + Krista Philbrick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Richard Deitz
125W–117L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.68
5
Ryan Paul
55W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
4.46
4.5
Andrew Piston
71W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Andreas Ohrbeck
104W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Alana Wade
70W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Sara Simonson
197W–85L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Kim Hood
153W–136L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Krista Philbrick
202W–142L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Angela Boice
231W–109L career · 11 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.