Teams

SWW-STAC-Davis

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-09vs BC-Nelson/SchoddeLost 01
L#3 DoublesHam Kang / Leshya Wig vs Sarah Schodde / Daniel Halos4-6, 4-6
2026-08-01vs SWW-TLTC-PaulWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Sharkey / Florian Purganan vs Ryan Paul / Angela Boice3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Andry / Angela Byrum vs Andrew Piston / Kim Hood4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTami Davis / Darrel Leimback vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-26vs NWW-TCSP-LaoLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Andry / Nancy Chan vs Brooke Miller / Charles Thompson0-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs SWW-TLTC-PaulWon 21
L#1 DoublesRachel Lovingfoss / Adam Lucero vs Krista Philbrick / Richard Deitz3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTonya Schmid / Craig Schmid vs Andrew Piston / Kim Hood7-6, 5-4
W#3 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Chanel Nielsen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-18vs HBSQ-HoyWon 10
W#2 DoublesFlorian Purganan / Akiko Suzuki vs Robert Mann / Kim Evans6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-17vs SWW-TLTC-PaulLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Chanel Nielsen vs Ryan Paul / Angela Boice7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Andry / Angela Byrum vs Andrew Piston / Sara Simonson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRachel Lovingfoss / Adam Lucero vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-12vs HBSQ-HoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Andry / Beth Berris vs Bruno Caiado / Heidi Sutter6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-11vs NWW-AYTC-CzeislerLost 01
L#1 DoublesFlorian Purganan / Ping Yeh vs John Hieb / Emily Barrett3-6, 4-6
2026-06-20vs SWW-TLTC-PaulWon 21
L#1 DoublesCraig Schmid / Tonya Schmid vs Andrew Piston / Alana Wade1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFlorian Purganan / Tami Davis vs Andreas Ohrbeck / Krista Philbrick7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Colleen Sharkey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-13vs CP-Shen/OnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesFlorian Purganan / Eugenia Salvo vs Tuan Nguyen / Amy Hsu6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Andry / Beth Berris vs Ham Kang / Michele Ferreira6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Adam Lucero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.73
Craig Schmid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.39
Darrel Leimback
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
Chanel Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.38
Tami Davis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.34
Florian Purganan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Kevin Andry
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4.5
4.15
Angela Byrum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Ham Kang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Rachel Lovingfoss
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Colleen Sharkey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.52
Tonya Schmid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chanel Nielsen + Darrel Leimback20558% games+6.5% vs expected
Ham Kang + Colleen Sharkey8747% games+0.0% vs expected
Craig Schmid + Tonya Schmid251652% games−3.7% vs expected
Kevin Andry + Angela Byrum1443% games−8.2% vs expected
Rachel Lovingfoss + Adam Lucero134 matchesnot enough data
Tami Davis + Florian Purganan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Lucero
8W–16L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.77
5
Craig Schmid
30W–27L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Darrel Leimback
129W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Chanel Nielsen
247W–120L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Tami Davis
235W–124L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Florian Purganan
137W–91L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Kevin Andry
165W–166L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Angela Byrum
212W–122L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Ham Kang
103W–131L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Rachel Lovingfoss
81W–69L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
4.5
Colleen Sharkey
140W–92L career · 5 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Tonya Schmid
68W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.