← Search

Rachel Lovingfoss

Shelton, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 81W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Lovingfoss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Tia Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Tia Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Tia Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Halie Geier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Myers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · SWW-STAC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Lucero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-17 · SWW-STAC-Davis · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Lucero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · SWW-STAC-Nielsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Oliver Vicente mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Randy Myers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Oliver Vicente championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
56.1%
37W–29L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams