← Search

Allison Erickson

Palmer, AK
4.0C year-end 2025
199 matches · 166W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
75%
stay 4.0
25%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.88. Lower than today’s 3.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
AK · 4.0
1 of 16

Allison is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Allison has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Allison has gone from the 26th to the 100th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 62.2% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
85.1%
40W–7L · 69.1% of games
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 76.6% of games
8.0mixed
85.5%
47W–8L · 71.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history199 matches
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Gillstrom
+0.045better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jessie Lief / Bridget Powers
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucille Abe
+0.011better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Emily Struzenberg / Jessie Lief
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Curry
−0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Anastasia Duboshina / Clare Salcedo-Obertmixedchamps
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Martha Davis / Dawn Baumannmixedchamps
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Dina Dulaney / Rachel Morganmixedchamps
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Martha Davis / Dawn Baumannmixedchamps
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Adeeti Ullal / Michelle Nicholsonmixedchamps
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Phyllis WAN-HUEN / Carole Allersmixedchamps
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Stone
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Kayongo
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Clendaniel
+0.000below expectation — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allen Clendaniel
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.