Dawn Baumann
Park Ridge, IL
564 matches · 399W–165L · seasons 2020–2027
Captains: add Dawn Baumann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history564 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-0, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams130 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 8Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 7STP Pirron Sat 12 $22
CDTA E M18&O9.0 1Cent Nakamura Sun 1 $20
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Mon 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O8.0 3.RT Lam-2 Sat 5 $27
CDTA S TriWHi 2.Tam Wright Sun 5 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.STP Pirron Sat 12 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 3.Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
CDTA W M18&O9.0 4.Wlmt Nakamura Sun 11 $20
CDTA W M40&O8.0 1.RT Lam-1 Sat 7 $27
CDTA W TriWHi 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 80W55a Schaumburg-Adams
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 80W55d South Barrington-Pirron/Gray
NITA S 85CWc Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 80W55d South Barrington-Pirron/Gray
NITA W 85CWa Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
72.6%
225W–85L · 58.3% of games
4.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.7% of games
7.5
100%
18W–0L · 64.6% of games
8.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 58.5% of games
8.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 58.8% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
313 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
151 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
95 matches
#1 Singles
1%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.