Teams

NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas

2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

23 players · average NTRP 4.03 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesAnna Dau / Melissa Schopin vs Ashley Cobb / Kelly Markworth6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Merrell / Julie Steinberg vs Kelly Tenuta / Catherine Wasylenko7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Kristy Sweigard vs Staci Aitchison / Katie Ketchum6-3, 6-1
2026-07-14vs NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-CoreyWon 31
L#1 DoublesLeigh Keyser / Desiree Witte vs Suzanne Beu / Annette Hennessy0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHaina Shin vs Teodora Varcheva6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTiffany Carpenter / Christine Munteanu vs Angela Hanson / Stephanie Thompson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSilvia Kusaka / Allison Goldberg vs Marjorie Chen / Lesley Bantle6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Anna Dau vs Marie Reece / Tracy Reece4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGinger Riessen vs Meghan Jones4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Schopin / Dawn Baumann vs Ann Murtaugh / Tracy Richards3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Davis / Kristy Sweigard vs Lisa Rowen / Leigh Champagne2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Crystal Leighton vs Margaret Logsdon / Lisa Barnes6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGinger Riessen / Kim Kuwabara vs Cheri Medus / Lori Saguto6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeah Starkman / Tracy Merrell vs Jamie Thompson / Courtney Wilkison5-7, 5-4
2026-06-07vs NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-LukasWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Keyser / Desiree Witte vs Marla Gerard / Tracie Wilcox6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Munteanu / Dawn Baumann vs Karen Materick / Sally Washlow6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Jean Soh vs Yumi Ida / Louise Burnison6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Jean Soh vs Terra Jahns / Anne Zanella-Gleason6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHaina Shin vs MacY Morales7-5, 3-2
W#2 DoublesSilvia Kusaka / Kim Kuwabara vs Renee Buxton / Ali Gerstad6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Steinberg / Leah Starkman vs Urszula Farry / Anitra Willis3-6, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas6019516159
2NITA S 40W40a Score-Knutte/Odenbeck5118616156
3NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-Lukas42131125199
4NITA S 40W40f Huntley-Willis/Korreck33111329217
5NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey2481633219
6NITA S 40W40b Naperville-Bianchi/Tenuta1561838251
7NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus0691532228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kim Kuwabara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.08
Amy Pouba
published 4
4.08
Crystal Leighton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Tiffany Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Anna Dau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Desiree Witte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Ginger Riessen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.94
Christine Munteanu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Haina Shin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.93
Leigh Keyser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Dawn Baumann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Cara Waddle
published 4
3.89
Kristy Sweigard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Allison Goldberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Kristine Jurczyk
published 4.5
3.87
Tracy Merrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Melissa Schopin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Silvia Kusaka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Jean Soh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Abigail Emerson
published 4
3.62
Leah Starkman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Steinberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Davis + Crystal Leighton8075% games+21.1% vs expected
Martha Davis + Allison Goldberg9458% games+13.3% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ginger Riessen5160% games+11.3% vs expected
Jean Soh + Kristine Jurczyk15167% games+11.2% vs expected
Desiree Witte + Anna Dau5257% games+10.7% vs expected
Allison Goldberg + Crystal Leighton5360% games+9.8% vs expected
Dawn Baumann + Christine Munteanu14164% games+8.9% vs expected
Martha Davis + Haina Shin4159% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Kuwabara
174W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
4
Amy Pouba
41W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.08
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.08
Tiffany Carpenter
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Anna Dau
206W–99L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Desiree Witte
254W–183L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Christine Munteanu
89W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Haina Shin
200W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Leigh Keyser
98W–48L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Cara Waddle
150W–116L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Kristy Sweigard
224W–142L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Allison Goldberg
126W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4.5
Kristine Jurczyk
327W–126L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Tracy Merrell
103W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Melissa Schopin
103W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Jean Soh
455W–271L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Abigail Emerson
45W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Leah Starkman
219W–149L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Julie Steinberg
94W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.