Kristine Jurczyk
Chicago, IL
476 matches · 343W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Kristine Jurczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history476 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Kim Richards / Cathy Bloedorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams111 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 4.Score Ezike Sun 3 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 4.MTB Witte Sun 2 $27
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 85CWa Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.5
87%
60W–9L · 67.6% of games
4.0
69.8%
118W–51L · 58.5% of games
4.5
50%
12W–12L · 49.9% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
96.8%
30W–1L · 70.4% of games
8.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 61% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.1% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 61.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
182 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
169 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
103 matches
#1 Singles
3%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.