← Search

Julie Weidner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
368 matches · 189W–179L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history368 matches
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Seaman championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Seaman championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Seaman championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Newman
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rosemary Swierk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Richards
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Knapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephanie Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Matthews-Pluta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Therese Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Default
2026-06-06 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Purcell
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.9%
105W–83L · 53.2% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.1% of games
8.0
45.8%
55W–65L · 48.8% of games
8.5
43.9%
18W–23L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
148 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
136 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
84 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert