Elizabeth Burns
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
265 matches · 137W–128L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history265 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 18W4.5 1.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 4.NBRC Burns Sat 3 $30
CHI E M18.8.0 2.Gnvw Wu Sun 5 $21
Hold Registrations #2
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 4Cent Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Mon 7 $
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 1.Gnvw Wu Sun 5 $21
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
CHI F CW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CHI F CX7.5 8.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 5 $21
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA S 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA W 40W18d River Trails-Spinazze/Lam
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
30%
3W–7L · 44.4% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games
4.0
68.7%
57W–26L · 58.4% of games
4.5
44.3%
43W–54L · 47.3% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.5
45.9%
17W–20L · 49.4% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
74 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.