← Search

Nancy Manolis

Park Ridge, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
241 matches · 112W–129L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 34 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
88%
down to 3.5
12%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 64% down · 36% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.47. Higher than today’s 3.40 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
IL · 4.0
207 of 211
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Nancy is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nancy has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Nancy has gone from the 81st to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
44%
70W–89L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
46.7%
21W–24L · 51% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 43.6% of games
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history241 matches
L
Susan Ellison / Terri Whiting
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Purcell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Purcell
+0.017better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 5-3
L
Kristy Sweigard / Gysel Goitia
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Kosenkova
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
W
Barbara Chmieleski / Sarah W Johnson
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Modupe Sobo
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Orlowski
−0.011below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Ella Raseta / Liza Spinazze
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Purcell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
Karen Avery / Kelly Tenuta
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rochelle Meng
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Joanne Lund / Catherine Williams
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Purcell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
Cara Waddle / Julie Steinberg
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Lacopulos
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
L
Julie Alexander / Sue Christianson
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christie Jordan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Purcell
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Michele Berman / Libby Holdren
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Purcell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.