Rochelle Meng
Lake Forest, IL
382 matches · 184W–198L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Rochelle Meng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history382 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 9.MTB Breger Sun 4 $29
CHI E 40W4.0 10.MTB Meng Sat 2 $29
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 8MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 10MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 12.MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 4.MTB Witte Sun 2 $27
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
52.8%
95W–85L · 52% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
77.1%
27W–8L · 60.7% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 52.3% of games
8.0
35.1%
26W–48L · 46% of games
8.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 48.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 48.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
153 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
124 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
103 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.