Masako Ueda
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmette, IL
349 matches · 226W–123L · seasons 2018–2026
USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.
Match history349 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams106 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 12.Wilm Crisham Sat 5 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 3.Gnbk Ueda Sat 3 $30
CHI E 55W8.0 3.ACN Ueda Sun 3 $24
CHI E M18.8.0 6.RT Burks Sun 10 $29
NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey
NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 4Cent Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 1Gnbk Ueda Sun 11 $30
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $22
CDTA E 55&OW9.0 2RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 14.Wilm Crisham Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 1.Gnbk Ueda Sun 1 $30
CDTA S 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 2.Nielsen Ueda Sun 1 $22
CDTA S 55&OW9.0 1.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 1.Wlmt Crisham Sat 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 1.Gnbk Ueda Sun 11 $30
CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $22
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 3.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA F 85CWb South Barrington-Reyna
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
44W–11L · 60.5% of games
4.0
66.4%
81W–41L · 56.3% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.2% of games
7.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 70.2% of games
7.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 47.9% of games
8.0
60.8%
45W–29L · 53.1% of games
8.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 50% of games
9.0
70%
7W–3L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 74% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
155 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
88 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.