← Search

Andrea Church

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Batavia, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 83W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history146 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ellen Elliot
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · NITA E 40W40f Vaughan-Medus/Sleezer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marci Sterkel
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Saguto
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sterling Decker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-4, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-05 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sterling Decker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gail Wilson
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-21 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Wright
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Ulie
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marci Sterkel
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · NITA W 85CWc Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Hartford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · NITA W 40W40h Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Barnes
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-04-18 · NITA W 80W55a Rush Copley-Church/Hartford · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marilyn Tansey
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
64.6%
42W–23L · 54.2% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.3% of games
8.0
60.4%
32W–21L · 53% of games
8.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.5% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams