← Search

Angela Hanson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 125W–149L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history274 matches
L
2026-10-18 · CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reatha Kay
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Masako Ueda
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Lichtor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-20 · CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Kusaka
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-20 · CHI E 55W8.0 7.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paulette Jenne
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-13 · CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Campbell
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Knapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Knapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Lobo-Corey championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paulette Jenne
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-07-15 · CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Lichtor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Thompson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams100 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
ESL 18 & Over · Women 4.0 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.0 · 40+
2027
CHI E 55W8.0 7.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
ESL 55 & Over · Women 8.0 · 55+
2027
NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2027
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2027
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 8.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 7.5
2026
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 8.5
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.0 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 8.0 Winter · 55+
2026
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 7.5 Winter
2026
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 8.5 Winter
2026
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
Fall Combo · Women 8.5
2026
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Corey
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 55 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 55 & Over · NITA Winter 55&Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 42.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.8%
69W–57L · 51.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.3% of games
8.0
38%
27W–44L · 46.2% of games
8.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
99 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
57 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King