Leah Starkman
Highland Park, IL
381 matches · 229W–152L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Leah Starkman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history381 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Burns / Cris Montresor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams99 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 9.MTB Breger Sun 4 $29
CHI E 40W4.0 10.MTB Meng Sat 2 $29
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 8MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 7MTB Fishleder Sat 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 10MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA E M18&O8.0 5MTB Koliatsis Sun 6 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 12.MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA W ComboW8.5 4.MTB Witte Sun 2 $27
CDTA W M40&O8.0 3.MTB Koliatsis Sat 4 $27
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 59.2% of games
3.5
77%
47W–14L · 63.4% of games
4.0
63.8%
120W–68L · 56.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.1% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.7% of games
8.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games
7.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 46% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
143 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
118 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.