Priscilla Ewaldz
Lake Forest, IL
329 matches · 145W–184L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Priscilla Ewaldz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history329 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Esther Vorovich / Kara Glassman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2021–2026
CDTA E 55&OW9.0 2RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA E M18&O8.0 4RT Burks Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 55&OW9.0 1.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
CDTA S TriWMid 4.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 3.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
CDTA W TriWMid 2.RCLB Ewaldz Sun 4 $22
CHI F CW8.5 2.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $25
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
53.9%
48W–41L · 53.3% of games
4.5
38.5%
25W–40L · 49.2% of games
8.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 50.9% of games
8.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 53% of games
9.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 56.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
43.8%
14W–18L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
14.6%
6W–35L · 38.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
93 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.