← Search

Janet Hanks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 63W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history101 matches
W
2026-10-16 · CHI E 40W3.5 3.MTC Brown Fri 7 $34.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Lubotsky
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-10 · CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Sartino
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-27 · CHI E 18W3.5 3.MTC Brown-1 Sat 1 $34.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Gallagher
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shay Nothman championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Kondo championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 1 $33.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Sawin
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-3
L
2026-07-07 · CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kajal Sangal
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Burns
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 1 $33.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Polachek
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fuller
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-5
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Yuen championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · CDTA W TriWLo 1.RT Ford Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Apple Naughton
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 60.7% of games
3.5
66.2%
45W–23L · 57% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.4% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert