Erin Baker
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
130 matches · 71W–59L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history130 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 1MTC Brown1 Sat 1 $33.5
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 5RT Greenberg Sun 6 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 3RT Fuller Sun 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 7.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 1.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA W TriWLo 5.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 3 $21
NITA S 35W18b River Trails-Lam
NITA W 35W40f Wilmette-Lam
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 63% of games
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 53.4% of games
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 56.6% of games
4.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 42.5% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.