Molly Shapiro
100 matches · 58W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Molly Shapiro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history100 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Patricia Nelson / Cindy Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
W
Patricia Nelson / Carlene Motto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Alison Miller / Colleen Chionis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 8MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 10MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 4.MTB(OUT) Witte Wed 6:30 $29
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 12.MTB Meng Sat 2 $27
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 54% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
60%
9W–6L · 55% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.