Jean Soh
Chicago, IL
751 matches · 468W–283L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Jean Soh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history751 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
Erica White / Michelle Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams155 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 18W4.5 1.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 4.NBRC Burns Sat 3 $30
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 4Cent Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30
CDTA E M18&O8.0 3CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Sun 3 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 2.Wilm Burns Mon 7 $
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O9.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 3 $22
CDTA S M40&O9.0 2.RT Tranter Sun 12 $27
CDTA S TriWLo 7.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20
CDTA W ComboW7.5 3.RT Stathopoulos Sun 6 $27
CDTA W ComboX7.5 7.McFet Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA W M18&O9.0 3.Tam Copland Sun 3 $22
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
CDTA W TriWLo 5.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 3 $21
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette Tennis-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.5
74.7%
62W–21L · 62.7% of games
4.0
65.8%
192W–100L · 57.4% of games
4.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 41% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.1%
54W–22L · 59.9% of games
8.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
67.3%
33W–16L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
52.4%
33W–30L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
37.2%
16W–27L · 46.5% of games
8.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 47% of games
9.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 47% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
268 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
221 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
167 matches
#1 Singles
10%
73 matches
#2 Singles
2%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.