← Search

Thomas Tranter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 105W–80L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-25 · CHI E 18M4.5 6.RT Tranter Sun 10 $29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Peistrup
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · CDTA S M40&O9.0 2.RT Tranter Sun 12 $27 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jean Soh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-23 · CDTA S TriMHi 1.RT Ciuca Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Kohn
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · CDTA S M40&O9.0 2.RT Tranter Sun 12 $27 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jean Soh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-11 · CDTA S TriMHi 1.RT Ciuca Sat 2 $27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liam Nance
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-09 · CDTA S M40&O9.0 2.RT Tranter Sun 12 $27 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jean Soh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · CDTA S 18&OM4.5 6.RT Tranter Sun 10 $27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Warren San Luis
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · CDTA S 18&OM4.5 6.RT Tranter Sun 10 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Peistrup
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-04-26 · CDTA W M18&O9.0 5.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 5.RT Tranter Sun 10 $27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Warren San Luis
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-01 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 5.RT Tranter Sun 10 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Zimmerman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-16 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 5.RT Tranter Sun 10 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Warren San Luis
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
50%
8W–8L · 51.6% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
62.1%
64W–39L · 53.3% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
8.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.4% of games
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.6% of games
9.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova