← Search

Emily Doyle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park Ridge, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 163W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-10-25 · CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bill Bowman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-10-24 · CHI F CW8.5 2.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeannie Levy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-23 · CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marikko Orr
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-03 · CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ruth Karakosta
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Hong mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grace Kuhrt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marie Reece championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Jurczyk championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grace Kuhrt championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Jurczyk championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Jurczyk championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristine Jurczyk championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20
ESL 18 & Over · Women 4.5 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.5 · 40+
2027
CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29
ESL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 9.0 · 18+
2027
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 2STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 4.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 4.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA E M18&O9.0 4RT Stenmark Fri 7:30 $27
CDTA ESL Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA E Mixed 18&O 9.0 · 18+
2026
CDTA E M40&O8.0 1RT Lam1 Sat 2 $27
CDTA ESL Mixed 40 & Over · CDTA ESL Mixed 40&O 8.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 5.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 4.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Wed 7 $22
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 4.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA S ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Wed 7 $22
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 8.5
2026
CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $27
1Summer Combo Mix WN/WE · Mixed 7.5
2026
CDTA S M18&O8.0 2.CPE Sitar Fri 7 $28
1Summer Mixed 18&O WN/WE · Mixed 8.0 · 18+
2026
CDTA S M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-1 Sun 4 $27
1Summer Mixed 40&O WN/WE · Mixed 8.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S TriWMid 8.Gnvw Baltazar Tue 7 $21
1Summer Tri-level WN/WE · Women Mid 3.5/4.0/4.5
2026
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 2.STP Wright Sat 3 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 4.5 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.5 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W ComboW8.5 3.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $22
Cdta 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 8.5 Winter
2026
CDTA W M18&O9.0 5.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $27
CDTA 1Winter Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W M40&O8.0 1.RT Lam-1 Sat 7 $27
CDTA 1Winter Mixed 40 & over · CDTA Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
CDTA 1Winter Tri Level · Women Hi 4.0/4.5/5.0
2026
CHI F CW8.5 2.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $25
Fall Combo · Women 8.5
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.7% of games
4.0
75.3%
55W–18L · 64% of games
4.5
76.1%
35W–11L · 59.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.1% of games
7.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
28W–8L · 58.5% of games
8.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
47 matches
#1 Singles
17%
41 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova