Kim Richards
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
181 matches · 109W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 6 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 4 $25
NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 3Naper Richards Sat 6 $24
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 2Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA E 55&OW9.0 1Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 3.NTC Richards Wed 7 $24
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 4.NTC Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA S 55&OW9.0 2.NTC DeMari Thu 7 $24
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 3.Naper Richards Sat 6 $24
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 1.Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
NITA W 85CWd Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
63%
87W–51L · 55.2% of games
8.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.4% of games
9.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.