← Search

Marikko Orr

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glenview, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 56W–35L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history91 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Desai
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-11-01 · CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · CHI E M18.9.0 3.RT Stenmark Fri 7 $29 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-25 · CHI F CX8.5 2.ACN Phelps Sun 4 $24 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Randy Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-10-23 · CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Doyle
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-11 · CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suzanne Beu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-5
L
2026-09-27 · CHI F CX8.5 2.ACN Phelps Sun 4 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Randy Orr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-20 · CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Keara Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · CHI E 40W4.5 3.Gnbk Ueda Sat 3 $30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Desai
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Soong
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suzanne Beu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · CDTA S TriWMid 5.Nielsen Lund Sun 1 $22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Desai
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 49% of games
4.0
70%
21W–9L · 59.7% of games
4.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.2% of games
8.5
70%
7W–3L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.5% of games
8.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer