Cathy Packer
Elmhurst, IL
123 matches · 76W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Cathy Packer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history123 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Ashley Martin / Chandana Namburi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.5 4.Score Ezike Sun 3 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 1.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $25
NITA E 90W55a Vaughan-McTeague/McClure
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 6Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.5 3Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 3.Tam Jurczyk Sat 1 $22
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
NITA W 85CWd Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
59.8%
52W–35L · 54.1% of games
8.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 56.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.