← Search

Nancy Cushing

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
364 matches · 242W–122L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history364 matches
L
2026-10-24 · NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Lesko
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-17 · NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Penny Heuer
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-10-11 · CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Lobo-Corey
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-10 · NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anna Hartford
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sue DeMari championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-19 · CHI E 40W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 4 $25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Penny Heuer
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · CDTA S 55&OW9.0 2.NTC DeMari Thu 7 $24 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Karen Rauh
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracy Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Ellison
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrea Galligan Kuc
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2027
CHI E 40W4.5 2.NTC Richards Sat 4 $25
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.5 · 40+
2027
CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25
ESL 55 & Over · Women 8.0 · 55+
2027
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2027
NITA E 90W55b Courts Plus-Cushing/DiMari
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 9.0 Women · 55+
2027
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sat 11 $20
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 4.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 4.NTC Blaauw Sat 4 $24
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 4.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 8.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW9.0 2.NTC DeMari Thu 7 $24
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 9.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA W 18&OW4.5 1.Score Kamel Sun 1 $20
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 4.5 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 2.Naper Blaauw Sat 4 $24
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.5 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 8.0 Winter · 55+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW9.0 1.Naper DeMari Sat 4 $24
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 9.0 Winter · 55+
2026
CDTA W TriWHi 3.RT Chala Fri 7 $27
CDTA 1Winter Tri Level · Women Hi 4.0/4.5/5.0
2026
NITA E 40W18e Score-Knutte/Odenbeck
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 18 & Over · NITA ESL 18 & Over 4.0 Women · 18+
2026
NITA E 40W40f Score-Knutte/Odenbeck
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 55 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA S 85CWb Vaughan-McClure/McTeague
2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo · 8.5 Summer Combo Women
2026
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 55 & Over · NITA Winter 55&Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
74.1%
117W–41L · 58.5% of games
4.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.3% of games
7.5
87.5%
42W–6L · 64.4% of games
8.0
64.6%
42W–23L · 57.5% of games
8.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 47.7% of games
9.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
188 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
64 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer