← Search

Donna Matkovic

Carol Stream, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
294 matches · 167W–127L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Donna Matkovic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history294 matches
L
2026-08-16 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raquel Karpinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Thornquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Christy Schaefer / Denise Rippetoe-Reed
2026-07-07 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-06-08 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Batka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Vlach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-21 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Batka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
58.3%
56W–40L · 56.2% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.6% of games
8.0
67.8%
61W–29L · 55.8% of games
8.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.4% of games
8.5mixed
40%
10W–15L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
69 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova