← Search

Lisa Vlach

Batavia, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 73W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Vlach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-07-18 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Brambora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-4
W
2026-06-24 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Miriam Abe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Katherine Martin
2026-06-09 · NITA S 40W18b Oak Brook-Lukas · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Melissa Sullivan
2026-06-02 · NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · NITA W 40W40h Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Brambora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Matkovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-12 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Matkovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Matkovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 50.2% of games
4.5
37%
27W–46L · 46.5% of games
8.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 54% of games
8.5
47.2%
17W–19L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#1 Singles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe