← Search

Vicki Mitchell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Batavia, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 180W–92L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history272 matches
L
2026-11-01 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marilyn Tansey
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-31 · NITA E 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Podwika mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-10 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zagorka James
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Galligan Kuc
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-25 · NITA E 80MX40c Naperville-Podwika · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Katzmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · NITA E 40W40b Naperville-Pongonis/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Call
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sterling Decker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-06-30 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with MacKenzie Danson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura McEnery
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with MacKenzie Danson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura McEnery
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.2%
84W–34L · 59.3% of games
7.5
76%
38W–12L · 60.1% of games
8.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.5% of games
8.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.1%
32W–13L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
163 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
36 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer