← Search

Denise Call

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Charles, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 40W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NITA E 40W40f Vaughan-Medus/Sleezer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with BethAnn Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · NITA E 40W40f Vaughan-Medus/Sleezer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Ulie
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-19 · NITA E 80W55b Rush Copley-Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Mitchell
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
Default
2026-08-05 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Moss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · NITA S 75WCDc St. Charles CC-Shields · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patty Poorten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-6, 1-0
W
Default
2025-11-23 · NITA E 40W40g Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Seal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Skuja
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-08 · NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Skuja
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-02 · NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shields
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-01 · NITA E 40W40g Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shields
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-10-26 · NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shields
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-25 · NITA E 40W18f Norris-Sullivan/Skuja · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Schaefer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
44.8%
13W–16L · 52% of games
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer