← Search

Annette Hennessy

Elmwood Park, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
311 matches · 150W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Annette Hennessy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history311 matches
W
2026-08-12 · NITA S 75WCDd Oak Park Tennis-Meyers/Locke · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Hermanns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-08-11 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gail Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · NITA S 75WCDd Oak Park Tennis-Meyers/Locke · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Hermanns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margo Carvell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lici Lytle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Nick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · NITA S 75WCDd Oak Park Tennis-Meyers/Locke · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Hermanns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Beu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Brooke Bean / Lisa Barnes
2026-07-12 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ling Arenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-25 · NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lici Lytle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40W4.0 7.TFOP Sujack Fri 7:30 $28
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.0 · 40+
2027
CHI E 55W8.0 5.Tam Corey Sun 1 $25
ESL 55 & Over · Women 8.0 · 55+
2027
NITA E 80W55d Score-Hennessy/Matkovic
2027 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2027
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
1Summer 55&O WN/WE · Women 8.0 · 55+
2026
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Tam Corey Sun 1 $22
CDTA 1Winter 55 & over W/E · CDTA 55 & Over W 8.0 Winter · 55+
2026
CDTA W 65&OW8.0 1.Score Hennessy Tue 11 $20
CDTA 1Winter 65 & Over W/D · CDTA 65 & Over W 8.0 Winter · 65+
2026
NITA E 40W40d Tennis Centre Oak Park-Poe/Sujack
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Corey
2026 NITA1 ESL Adult 55 & Over · NITA ESL 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA S 75WCDd Oak Park Tennis-Meyers/Locke
2026 NITA3 Summerz Combo Daytime · NITA Summer Daytime 7.5 Combo Women
2026
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 55 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
NITA S 80W65c Score-Hennessy/Matkovic
2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 65 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Women · 65+
2026
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 40 & Over · NITA Winter 40&Over 4.0 Women · 40+
2026
NITA W 75CWa Hinsdale-Kamenev/Hennessy
2026 NITA2 Winterz Combo 18 & Over · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women · 18+
2026
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
2026 NITA2 Winter Adult 55 & Over · NITA Winter 55&Over 8.0 Women · 55+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
47.1%
64W–72L · 49.2% of games
7.5
52.2%
24W–22L · 50.9% of games
8.0
49%
51W–53L · 49.2% of games
8.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
85 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer