Teams

CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesAnnette Hennessy / Laura Purcell vs Lara Phillips / Keiko Okuda6-7, 5-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Reatha Kay vs Margo Carvell / Youngran Chung4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLaura Purcell / Silvia Kusaka vs Lisa Potash / Maria Lourdes Bandelow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Rosenkrantz / Sang Boon Lee vs Jennifer Margolis / Rachel Kaiser4-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSusan Schierl Sullivan / Jill Siegel vs Terra Jahns / Terri Whiting1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Fran Wiechart vs Debra Brambora / Lori Saguto6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSilvia Kusaka / Huan Chang vs Dawn Baumann / Laurie Gray6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Fran Wiechart vs Kelly Carroll / Hoda Elshakankery1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hennessy / Gail Wilson vs Debbie Reyna / Laura Pearson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLing Arenson / Huan Chang vs Nancy Hirsch / Pamela Leichtling7-5, 5-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Schierl Sullivan / Jill Siegel vs Beth Robitaille / Carla Young2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnnette Hennessy / Fran Wiechart vs Robyn Hurtig / Roberta Louis Goodman1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Langtry / Silvia Kusaka vs Tricia Krueger / Diedre Castaldo6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnnette Hennessy / Ling Arenson vs Debbie Skowron / Lisa Laham6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $226012614106
2CDTA E 55&OW8.0 7STP Pirron Sat 12 $225113514132
3CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $273310817158
4CDTA E 55&OW8.0 4Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22339921153
5CDTA E 55&OW8.0 3Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $242471126176
6CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $221561225182
7CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $221561226187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Jennifer Langtry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Christine Rosenkrantz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Jill Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.96
Huan Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Annette Hennessy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Gail Wilson
published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Fran Wiechart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Reatha Kay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Ling Arenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Julie Weidner
published
3.35
Sang Boon Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Ryan
published 3.5
3.02
Susan Schierl Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ling Arenson + Julie Weidner12851% games+8.8% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+8.5% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Jennifer Langtry14663% games+4.2% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Fran Wiechart5451% games+3.3% vs expected
Annette Hennessy + Julie Weidner6548% games−1.4% vs expected
Annette Hennessy + Fran Wiechart2843% games−3.2% vs expected
Fran Wiechart + Julie Weidner4745% games−4.4% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Annette Hennessy1440% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jennifer Langtry
254W–112L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Christine Rosenkrantz
26W–20L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
4.10
Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Annette Hennessy
150W–161L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Elizabeth Quigley
103W–76L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Fran Wiechart
40W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Reatha Kay
26W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Sang Boon Lee
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Anne Ryan
20W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Susan Schierl Sullivan
101W–97L career · 6 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.