Teams

CDTA E 55&OW8.0 3Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $24

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesDebbie Skowron / Diedre Castaldo vs Kathy Kasiurak / Michelle Reynolds6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRina Daw / Catherine Wasylenko vs Mya Murata / Barbara Lee-Budin5-7, 4-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Lee Ruda vs Patricia Behnke / Julie Pawula1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Kelly Tenuta vs Molly Shapiro / Rochelle Meng3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDorothy OMalley / Debbie Skowron vs Rachel Kaiser / Julie Alexander6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Jones / Margaret McAndrews vs Susan Kalina / Maria Lourdes Bandelow3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJulie Boruff / Diedre Castaldo vs Terra Jahns / Marilyn Tansey6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Jones / Dorothy OMalley vs Teri Ayotte / Lori Saguto2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret McAndrews / Diana Pavlova vs Anne Zanella-Gleason / Conni Stinek2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Boruff / Rina Daw vs Carlene Motto / Patricia Nelson3-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Skowron / Dorothy OMalley vs Hoda Elshakankery / Kelly Carroll3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Tenuta / Lee Ruda vs Debbie Reyna / Laura Pearson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Jones / Kelly Tenuta vs Tracy Richards / Masako Ueda5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Catherine Wasylenko vs Roberta Louis Goodman / Robyn Hurtig - *7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Margaret McAndrews vs Yarina Birnbaum / Beth Robitaille6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesTricia Krueger / Diedre Castaldo vs Jennifer Langtry / Silvia Kusaka2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Skowron / Lisa Laham vs Annette Hennessy / Ling Arenson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Tenuta / Martha Skryd vs Anne Ryan / Gail Wilson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $226012614106
2CDTA E 55&OW8.0 7STP Pirron Sat 12 $225113514132
3CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $273310817158
4CDTA E 55&OW8.0 4Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22339921153
5CDTA E 55&OW8.0 3Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $242471126176
6CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $221561225182
7CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $221561226187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Julie Boruff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Catherine Wasylenko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Debbie Skowron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Diana Pavlova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Dorothy OMalley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Diedre Castaldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Rina Daw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Lee Ruda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Martha Skryd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Kelly Tenuta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Margaret McAndrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Maureen Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Skowron + Diedre Castaldo5263% games+23.4% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Martha Skryd8851% games+3.8% vs expected
Diedre Castaldo + Kelly Tenuta2539% games+2.8% vs expected
Debbie Skowron + Julie Boruff2547% games−7.2% vs expected
Catherine Wasylenko + Diedre Castaldo3649% gamesnot enough data
Diana Pavlova + Kelly Tenuta5160% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Bianchi + Dorothy OMalley134 matchesnot enough data
Rina Daw + Martha Skryd134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Boruff
117W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Catherine Wasylenko
98W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Debbie Skowron
56W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Diana Pavlova
19W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Diedre Castaldo
47W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Rina Daw
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Lee Ruda
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Martha Skryd
87W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.47
4
Kelly Tenuta
90W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Margaret McAndrews
72W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Maureen Henderson
101W–68L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Katherine Bianchi
66W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Susan Jones
33W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.