Teams

CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesLisa Lowenthal / Carla Young vs Marilyn Tansey / Terri Whiting0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRoberta Louis Goodman / Noreen Ohcana vs Linda Borst / Lici Lytle6-7, 4-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobyn Hurtig / Paula McKendry vs Renee Buxton / Erica Eisner3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLinda Genty / Paula McKendry vs Dawn Baumann / Laurie Gray2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRoberta Louis Goodman / Alja Hessami-Maas vs Mary Etherington / Carlene Motto7-6, 4-2
L#1 DoublesPamela Leichtling / Kate Newman vs Desiree Witte / Sheila Bondoc3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMasako Ueda / Carla Young vs Maria Lourdes Bandelow / Lisa Potash3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesYarina Birnbaum / Linda Genty vs Molly Shapiro / Narissa Breger6-7, 3-5
L#1 DoublesNancy Hirsch / Pamela Leichtling vs Ling Arenson / Huan Chang5-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesBeth Robitaille / Carla Young vs Susan Schierl Sullivan / Jill Siegel6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobyn Hurtig / Roberta Louis Goodman vs Annette Hennessy / Fran Wiechart6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTracy Richards / Masako Ueda vs Susan Jones / Kelly Tenuta7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoberta Louis Goodman / Robyn Hurtig - * vs Diana Pavlova / Catherine Wasylenko5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesYarina Birnbaum / Beth Robitaille vs Maureen Henderson / Margaret McAndrews2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKate Newman / Pamela Leichtling vs Stephanie Batka / Karen Whitebloom3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Carla Young vs Yumi Ida / Irene Powers7-5, 0-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYarina Birnbaum / Paula McKendry vs Youngran Chung / Margo Carvell4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $226012614106
2CDTA E 55&OW8.0 7STP Pirron Sat 12 $225113514132
3CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $273310817158
4CDTA E 55&OW8.0 4Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22339921153
5CDTA E 55&OW8.0 3Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $242471126176
6CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $221561225182
7CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $221561226187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Tracy Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Masako Ueda
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Joanne Lund
published 4
Carla Young
published 4
3.74
Lisa Lowenthal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kate Newman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Robyn Hurtig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Yarina Birnbaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Pamela Leichtling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Alja Hessami-Maas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Noreen Ohcana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Linda Genty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Paula McKendry
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Beth Robitaille
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula McKendry + Robyn Hurtig131051% games+9.8% vs expected
Robyn Hurtig + Yarina Birnbaum4250% games+6.0% vs expected
Yarina Birnbaum + Joanne Lund18363% games+4.0% vs expected
Linda Genty + Yarina Birnbaum7655% games+0.6% vs expected
Paula McKendry + Linda Genty8453% games+0.5% vs expected
Noreen Ohcana + Lisa Lowenthal2838% games+0.4% vs expected
Noreen Ohcana + Pamela Leichtling1637% games−16.9% vs expected
Robyn Hurtig + Linda Genty6356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Richards
113W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Masako Ueda
156W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Carla Young
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Lisa Lowenthal
20W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kate Newman
39W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Robyn Hurtig
103W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
4
Yarina Birnbaum
69W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Pamela Leichtling
47W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
212W–213L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Noreen Ohcana
61W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Linda Genty
86W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Paula McKendry
88W–95L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Beth Robitaille
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Jacqueline Henderson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.