Teams

CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.04 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Tansey / Terri Whiting vs Lisa Lowenthal / Carla Young6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Borst / Lici Lytle vs Roberta Louis Goodman / Noreen Ohcana7-6, 1-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRenee Buxton / Erica Eisner vs Robyn Hurtig / Paula McKendry6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTerra Jahns / Terri Whiting vs Susan Schierl Sullivan / Jill Siegel6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Brambora / Lori Saguto vs Laura Purcell / Fran Wiechart4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErica Eisner / Lici Lytle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesTerra Jahns / Marilyn Tansey vs Julie Boruff / Diedre Castaldo1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Lori Saguto vs Susan Jones / Dorothy OMalley6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Zanella-Gleason / Conni Stinek vs Margaret McAndrews / Diana Pavlova6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesDebra Brambora / Lori Saguto vs Stephanie Batka / Keiko Okuda2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Borst / Terra Jahns vs Patricia Behnke / Raquel Karpinski6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConni Stinek / Anne Zanella-Gleason vs Nancy Maska / Irene Powers6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLori Saguto / Marilyn Tansey vs Dawn Baumann / Gayle Dominicis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerra Jahns / Lori Raffone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJanice McKane / Anne Zanella-Gleason vs Sheryl Albert / Amy Byrne6-7, 0-5
W#1 DoublesAnne Zanella-Gleason / Terra Jahns vs Rochelle Meng / Desiree Witte6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Buxton / Lori Raffone vs Julie Alexander / Linda Meyer6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Janice McKane vs Rachel Kaiser / Lisa Potash6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA E 55&O Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $226012614106
2CDTA E 55&OW8.0 7STP Pirron Sat 12 $225113514132
3CDTA E 55&OW8.0 6MTB Kalina Sat 2 $273310817158
4CDTA E 55&OW8.0 4Centre Carvell Sun 10 $22339921153
5CDTA E 55&OW8.0 3Naper Bianchi Sat 6 $242471126176
6CDTA E 55&OW8.0 1Tam Corey Sun 1 $221561225182
7CDTA E 55&OW8.0 2Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $221561226187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Terri Whiting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Anne Zanella-Gleason
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Terra Jahns
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Marilyn Tansey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Lici Lytle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Lori Raffone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lori Saguto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Linda Borst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Janice McKane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Conni Stinek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Renee Buxton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Teri Ayotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terra Jahns + Lori Saguto13164% games+9.9% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Linda Borst281357% games+8.8% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Anne Zanella-Gleason11169% games+7.7% vs expected
Erica Eisner + Linda Borst5554% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Raffone + Linda Borst4154% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Saguto + Marilyn Tansey10458% games+5.6% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Lori Raffone6454% games+4.3% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Erica Eisner13265% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Marilyn Tansey
216W–144L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Lici Lytle
55W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lori Raffone
81W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lori Saguto
223W–119L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Linda Borst
78W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Janice McKane
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Renee Buxton
141W–123L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Teri Ayotte
66W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.