Erica Eisner
Palatine, IL
434 matches · 295W–139L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Erica Eisner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history434 matches
W
Irene Powers / Michelle Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
L
Lara Phillips / Michelle Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 2.Herit Lytle Sat 12 $26
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 55W8.0 2.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 6Herit Chmieleski Sat 12 $25
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 55&OW8.0 5STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 3.FV Lytle Thu 7 $25
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 3.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 7.Herit Ligammari Sat 12 $25
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.STP Eisner Sun 10 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 4.Herit Eisner Sun 3 $25
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Corey
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.8%
143W–65L · 59.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 62.8% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.5% of games
8.0
70.6%
89W–37L · 59.7% of games
8.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 53.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
220 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
124 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
89 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.